Philosophy – “Sophia against Sophia: Discovery versus an Absence of Choice” – 7/18/2020

What makes the woman feel empowered? In the two eyes of mine, and only the two eyes of mine, I have observed it to be somewhat natural for a woman to be interested in vastness. Vastness of choice, and never a submission to limitation. She is interested in what causes her horizons to expand, and her choices to be upon the numerable. She is not interested in being limited, for she possesses wings. It is that a woman yearns for freedom, craves it like the wind in her long hair, and can sometimes starve herself to it upon the time she exits out of love. Memories are to a woman, the entrapment of her from experiencing a more.

Yet, why has no one seemingly considered, in recent years, that a woman’s “desire to discover” is based around herself? To a world, she is the most “edible being”. By that, she is given many seeds, many sprouts from her womb. As she represents life, she can represent what is starved of life. For the infant to the child will display widened, curious eyes. It is to say that little things are immensely curious of the larger in physical size. A woman, in that sense, is interested in a man’s power, not in her own.

Does a woman, in such a sense, even possess power of her own, if all she is interested in, is what a man can do? Of everything small in physical size, will become interested in the large in physical size. For a man will display acts of chivalry when he can, so that her intellect is preserved. To think of it in this fashion, that a man of larger physical form, might protect a woman of smaller physical form. It is that he innately comprehends her smaller physical form to mean that she possesses a greater intellect than his own. For a man innately comprehends that she is much better than he, in that she will not be as brutal. For a large physical size, in the department of animals, means dominance. Though, of shadows, and only of shadows, is the physical size apparent. Physical size creates shadows, and it is why a man has been termed a giant. To a woman, being small in size, must mean that to a man, she is his light. A true light, as more than any sincere compliment, refers her to him as a truer savior than any act of himself to protect her from physical danger with his size.

The small in physical size, has much for intellect. The small in intellect, has much in physical size. There is no third path, anymore than a person has a third arm.

Sophia was the fallen one of self-discovery. Truth, to a woman, is of her, for she is consumed by the world, both of breast and of comfort. Whether that represent, to today’s time, “comfort food” or to simply be stagnant and fearful, a woman is the seducer to the giant, to breed the biblical “The Fall of Man”.

In truth, there is something discovered. In love, there is a person discovered, who makes up our reflection, being not of the one we had seen only of ourselves. For to knowledge’s sake, we are seeing another world, yet a familiar one, for part of that discovered world of love, is ourselves.

Can a woman see that she is the tool of growth, to any nation, to any culture, to any idea of critical thought? Yet, she can be treated as not loved, though produced in a perpetual nature, enough to be someone mass produced of her expulsions. She expels from her the infants for newer generations. Though, when the world booms in population, this is misused, and mere lust becomes the lesson of any human. That lesson is the teaching for a human that they must create, to create, again. Love, or rather, having no choice, has no meaning in this.

For when we love, we have already discovered. And, when we have devoted ourselves, in the name of our life, to that special someone, we lack any choice to escape from them. It is that we do not want to escape, for we have already escaped from a worse world to a better one.

A man realizes to himself that he had nothing in his life, before he enters a woman’s arms, to then comprehend that he has everything.

A woman is the missing ingredient to a man’s moronic existence of continuous ambition. His life of independence halts when he has found a woman, having discovered his answer. To encourage a woman to engage in careers that pertain to science, might relate to the fact that a man has to halt all personal progress, soon as he has found love. When a woman’s psychology is used by the world to create the innumerable choices a society can have, there is no halt of progress. There is, again, the mass production coming from within her. She is continually used, though as merely a means to no end.

When possessing no choice, there is devotion. Though, not to the material, as having no choice will be for the non-material and organic. We love what relates to us, as we relate to what loves us. Therefore, in having no choice, we are not materialistic.

14 Comments

    1. romanticindeed

      Genetics for the first? A better opportunity for the second and third?

      All I’m trying to explain in this, is that physical size represents dominance over the protection of intellect.

      Ever hear of that saying, “Big things come in small packages?” It means that a larger intellect comes from a smaller shape. Why do you think geneticists gain a lot of knowledge from smaller creatures, like fruit flies? It is because there is much to learn from them.

      Like

      1. maylynno

        You know it is debatable issue to see if a woman’s strength lies in her ability to be smaller and more vulnerable, yet more manipulative.

        The problem is not what you are stating because I know you are a deep thinker. The problem is for some narrow minded men who might understand your statement differently. That’s why I asked my 1st questions.
        All this besides the fact that I enjoy our discussions.

        Like

    2. romanticindeed

      You mentioned physical size for the first example you presented. Though, you went into intellect which produced the second and third example. That’s a contradiction, right there, because the first example has no relation to the second and third.

      Like my example of a geneticist who gains knowledge from fruit flies, it relates to my post’s example of a man, termed to be a giant, who learns to not destroy things in his path when he finds a woman to protect.

      You ever King Kong? It’s the same concept. Or… you ever see a painting of an ogre, acting like an infant, sucking its thumb, with a teddy bear in its arms? It’s also the same concept.

      Like

      1. romanticindeed

        It is physical size that lacks intellect. It is the same reason why a “Fat Pride” woman will state that she appears beautiful, despite not having or even wanting anyone to protect her. Why would anyone protect the Hulk? That would require physical dominance over the Hulk, proving him weaker than whatever dominated him. It is the same concept as the “Fat Pride” woman, which means that she objectively not beautiful. Everything beautiful is something protected, being of a lesser size.

        Intellect is what we protect of a beautiful woman of a lesser size, because in a man who sees through her physical beauty, finds his way to her mind and discovers something greater. Like the Hulk or “Fat Pride” woman example… why should beauty act as a stone wall, unable to be penetrated?

        Protection, which equates to a man at war. A man at war, which equates to what he penetrates of another man, being brutal at war, because he is a giant made to dominate another giant. When a man penetrates walls, he is only at war, as a giant against other giants. When a man loves a woman, he is not meant to face his own kind.

        I hope that makes better sense.

        Like

      2. romanticindeed

        Oh, you are far from being a common person. 🙂

        Don’t do that. I don’t like it when people see me as a “deep thinker” and then go to say that they are lesser to that, by calling themselves “common” or some other word. It actually greatly saddens me.

        Like

      3. romanticindeed

        You’re losing track of what I’m saying. I’m not the kind of guy who wants to place bars on a woman, preventing her from doing certain things or pursuing certain goals.

        I am merely trying to express the consequences of action. Cause and effect, as that is what interests me.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. romanticindeed

        Were a woman to go to war, then she would have to be physically trained for warfare, like a man.

        A man naturally has thicker tendons, stronger ligaments, greater bone density and mass. This means a man can kick and punch harder, naturally over a woman. To be honest, I see this as the greatest burden, while some women will envy this talent and want to do the same.

        In my eyes, a man is an idiot for wanting to be brutal, for wanting to be ambitious, for wanting to “go far”. I believe a man only goes so far as to stop on the tracks where he finds a beautiful woman, and then tosses away his history.

        I say that when a man finds a woman who he will remain devoted to until he’s dead, the rest of everything else he held precious is all at once a nothingness.

        Like

Leave a Reply to maylynno Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s