“In reality, we walk upon Earth. As well, we walk upon others. Obsessed with reality, we unknowingly walk upon others, through, as well, our obsession with discovery. Discovery of all realities, all things there to be touched, smelled, or tasted, are the senses we utilize when we perceive something in closeness. And yet, such senses of those individual three, are always to be the senses utilized when in that ‘heat of lust’ we describe to be made for ‘blood, sweat, and tears’. From flesh, we bleed, and through pain, we feel it. From sweat, we smell it. From tears, we taste them, as they drain to our open mouth. And, for the other two senses, of sight and sound, we can still be close enough to see, close enough to hear, either the sight of pain, or the sounds of pain.
For to be close enough to touch, smell, or taste, may as well be close enough to be the cause of the injury. For how can we cause the injury without opening the wound, or in the case of discovery, opening the book?
‘Appetite’ is the word we use during when we consume, utilizing the three ‘lustful senses’ in exact consecutive order. We touch the flesh, to smell the flesh, to taste the flesh. And, we are all rapists of ourselves and others at that point, obsessed with privacy and identity.”
Is this an attempt to forget a past? Such should be seen by all as an attempt by an Atheistic community to forget what religion spoke about, though still occurs. How do we define an afterlife?
It occurs today. We see Hitler and Stalin even for the genius they have somewhat shown in their time. We analyze their spoken words, for that is because we do not define a life by failure. The only failure that doomed both Hitler and Stalin, was the one that killed them.
Even among the most evil, we attempt to drag out even the smallest memory from those sorts, that reveals even the smallest fragment of goodness. For that is how an afterlife is defined, by the ‘eternal love’ from a memory that cannot be small. That is because it represents an eternity from something we always relate to when history repeats itself. Once more, we do not define a life by its death, but by its life, and the memories of good from even the most evil.
We prevail in every scenario, before we fail for the failure that kills us, because what has Darwin noticed besides the primary goal for each organism, which is ‘survival of the fittest’ or perhaps just simply ‘survival’? The one failure that kills life, is the only failure a life will ever experience. And those memories are cast as ‘eternal love’, an ‘afterlife’ for the person of even the most evil intent, to be remembered for their life, not their failure.
We study Hitler’s speeches, Stalin’s speeches, and many call them genius, because we are at a stalemate where we cannot speak ill of the dead, without defining ourselves as what goes against survival, which is cowardice.
And, in that love, we are eternally strong.
It is that realness of what we suppose does not exist, because what has been buried is inevitably forgiven by life, never remembered for failure, but forgiven for failure, and remembered for even the smallest increment of goodness.
What does Atheism have as as argument for this? What can an Atheist say for what they commonly do? It was Darwin, who has been called a Blasphemer by religious folks, who dubbed the term ‘survival of the fittest’ in what has been stated, here. It is science that makes analogies of the dead, though play directly into God’s hands.
For what good does love have, if it is not upon the ground in which we walk, in the soil where we have buried something to supposedly forget? It does nothing.
Love, upon religion, is condemned for its relation to the past…
“Atheism is a place of mind that believes in the Bible as lies, as the Romans did, during when they scarred Christ’s flesh. Relate now, truth to the same definition as flesh, and when truth is denied, flesh is always scarred. What derives from this, is change. From truth, to unrecognizable abnormality. Truth, or flesh, is meant to be clean, direct, and without damage. With damage, there is a lie, there was vulnerability upon Christ’s skin, ‘proof’ that Christ, or truth, could not withstand the blows from the scourge whip upon him. From the beating upon him, the Romans attempted to prove the vulnerability of truth, and succeeded. For Atheism to believe in the Bible as lies, is only in the same mindset as the Romans; that is, to ‘deny the truth’, becomes a belief in comfort, and science. Science creates changes, changes distort truth. Science creates question, and continued question from the Power of Reason, is never met with direct and clean answers.”
“Love is an eternity that a man denies. A man denies what perhaps God has founded to be a mistake, when even He could not see that His own creations would mirror the same mistakes. We call such unplanned creations of an infant, a ‘mistake’ perhaps for a reason, that we were acting out of lust to burn away a moment that would not last.
In the name of concealing truth, God would be concealed by Man, and next say that God does not exist. God concealed Man and Woman, through clothing, upon the Garden of Eden, when fault struck Mankind. Mankind, as a dose of vengeance, conceals God in the wake of realization, and that is the realization of the creation of more fault. Lust rises upwards like the heat from Hell, making itself a reality and easily seen, to make ‘mistake’ after ‘mistake’.
The only reason why Man denies God, is due to every bit of knowledge towards good and evil comes as a shock for him, comes as a tragedy of loss, comes as a creation gone missing; and, in this, Man denies God because love is not a good reason for neither Man nor God to exist. Man must therefore struggle to want love. To want no breaths in the captivation of that love.”
“Those scientists who reach for the impossible to turn into the possible, are who should be named, ‘Those who deny God, though long for His touch, His presence, His commandments.’ A scientist may say, ‘The impossible will become the possible, because those under the Banner of Democracy will be allowed to make any choice possible.’ And still, they meddle in those unknowns, reaching for darkness, for answers that may crack their minds; what is, I ask, the answers to life’s most amusing and entertaining questions? We ask questions, while we laugh in a comedy. We come to an answer, then the shock shifts us back to a tragedy. From certainty to comedy, then from tragedy to uncertainty; these are the maddening notions that make certainty aligned with fear. A scientist has to believe in God, if the denial of Him causes the scientist to still reach for answers. A scientist discovers, while God lays in wait; because, when we reach inside ourselves for those answers, we are finding more darkness rather than light, because light is only seen from an external source.”
“Everyone finds themselves to be an observer as a scientist, or as a philosopher. In this singular state, we stare at those around us. Each ‘scientific discovery’ only flows our attentions to the next one, upon the next, because we fail to throw our attentions upon the possibility of an eternity. An eternal attention, that is. It is also because each previous discovery has merely proven to be ‘obsolete’. To make a friendship, to make a romance, however, is to create the eternity that science continually rejects has any meaning. Scientists are bold enough to reach for the impossible, though are moronic enough to never see that the possible is what humans cling upon, because it doesn’t require ambition to create companionship. It requires mere submission.”
“To today’s time, we’ve discovered more of the internal, than of the external. There is a pattern of each person turning upon themselves, in this. The first part of the pattern is when humans believed in God, and could never perceive nor comprehend the infinite; the second part of the pattern is when humans believed in Philosophy, or the analyzing to the external of humans, and the embracing of theories; and the third part of the pattern is when humans believed in the usage of the sciences, and in this, we believe such internal discoveries to be less vague than anything else. Though, as the mindsets control the lot of humanity, we are, in this sense, the people who have also embraced selfishness. Because, to begin to see internally, we see less of the external, of others, of those others in need of our love or support. And the infinity becomes rejected at this point. For it turns out, by these written words, that the realest of things, are also the heaviest of things, creating the heaviest of burdens. Each human, when they are in love, will make mistakes, thus looking within themselves to seek a cure. To comprehend the other, is to comprehend what may be the infinite for the future.”
“We were once humans who had said that we are equal through love, and now, we are humans who say that equality can exist upon this Earth. Thus, we have only one option, which is to embrace the equality that death presents. When we turn away from the infinity of Heaven, of God, to the Earth, and look downwards to see our feet, to next discover all things presented before us, we begin to dig. We dig for all things history has erased. We dig for the realest of things we may each touch, taste, and smell.
Though, we can obviously see ourselves, and in the sense of sight, we see ourselves to be God. In the sense of hearing, we present distance or closeness. Closeness presents all things pertaining to lust, in all things pertaining to taste, touch, or smell. And, in everything related to simply sight or hearing, we pertain these things to the infinite, and everything we cannot comprehend, nor can we perceive. The ‘equality of death’ is the equality that shows itself upon Earth. We look upwards, then we see the universe and its infinity. In this, we do not see ourselves. We look downwards, we see the whole of our bodies.
The ‘equality of death’ is the only other equality besides love, since because we have rejected the judgement from God, we will next reject the judgement from a human. We believe ourselves, in this, to be on the level of the Earth. In the same sense, each dead person is at the same level. Silence of speech becomes the new norm in this, and the captivation that death presents, is the captivation that love presents, which is the same captivation that keeps us stilled. For, in this, we do not need to speak to comprehend one human to the next, when we are dying.”
“Though the modern world has no use for philosophy, we therefore show more liking to things held close, that would be picked apart by perceptions. Perceptions strike at the flaws to the external, while the use of the sciences will make use of everything in the internal. And yet, science cannot comprehend emotions without turning each description of them into a dry display of chemical correlations and functionality. When science discovers the internal, it does so by extensively analyzing it, which relates somewhat to philosophy. Although, there is a difference. That difference is the one that carries with it the ability to analyze the external. One would call this an assumption, though it is the same as making those perceptions of philosophical thought to see everything leaked from that inside. Like, of a wound, there comes the blood. A theory marks itself upon a perception, while science marks itself upon discovery. And, from this, we see that science makes a world turns less from the external, into the internal, until every human has embraced ugliness by ‘turning themselves inside out’. In such a way, we are each showing our flaws, for extensive judgement from the average human, and in this, they all become silenced to say that one cannot judge. A human, those of which we can see, casts judgement in the reveal of anger, and no one submits to it.”
“Faith has no more the definition to it, than trust. Is ‘trust’ now an ingredient so believed to be ‘irrelevant’ to a contemporary standard? It should be so, because, when God is believed to be non-existent, then so is Man. When Woman was believed to be invisible, to be ignored from society, she suffered. Guilt is remedied by trust. And, in a ‘contemporary’ society, a thirst for achievement, that which is prominent in this ‘contemporary’ society, Woman would be more trusted. Temptation, which runs in the veins of business, makes Woman trusted. We have said, ‘In God, we trust’ on the American currency. Though, when God is not trusted, then Man becomes the newest target. Man is not trusted, for Man’s actions. And, in today’s ‘contemporary’ society, all trust devoted to business needs, to ‘progress’, would never coincide to the slowness from Man, from the one who pits chivalry onto society for progress to be held back. Woman is eager, Woman is earnest, and trust is never devoted to Man, and it should also be inevitable that Woman would trust herself. Therefore, in a world where ‘business’ and ‘progress’ are society’s paths, guilt is never remedied upon Man, because what he has done, to make his guilt, is never trusted to be better. He is never trusted to do better.”