Quotes
-
“Does a woman want for deceptive men? Does a woman want for manipulative men? If no, then let him protect you. Be vulnerable around him. If you do not allow these things, then he’ll become the enraged terror, when he’s forced to protect only himself. A man’s honesty only ever surges out of him, whenever
-
“It is not so unbecoming of wrath, itself, to be the curtain above the waters. The flaming shield to the tears, for this is where a man protects himself, in deception. A man lies to himself, in self-preservation.” – Modern Romanticism Lies. It is the word a man clings to, whenever he shall be enraged.
-
“How weak to be, when arms lace through to injury. To life’s greatest secret, that to be in love, means to surrender beneath the meaningful gaze, the resplendent sun. Away from ambition, then to declaration, that the one who shall be loved, will be kept beating within the heart, beyond death.” – Modern Romanticism
-
“While all walks on, then all must be loved, for the matter of safety. By the genuine heart that never misguides, never missteps, comprehends purpose beneath its own weight, there is infinite pressure atop eternal light.” – Modern Romanticism There are those, and those, alone, who fight within the darkness. Love is a grave, for
-
“All arrogance behind human nature is where we find ourselves not as imperfect, beautiful creatures, and here willing to forsake what makes us ephemeral, in the vain desire to be more.” – Modern Romanticism It is in the aspect of knowing oneself, that to comprehend the self is to realize where one is limited, that
-
“To love’s logic, it does not encompass the multitude, as such always surrounds the oneness of it. We are one, under love, as we are never above it. It is to danger upon the beloved, that we focus on nothing else. To love being the epitome of logic, wills us on a straightforward path, whether
-
“One can be ignorant without being prejudiced. However, one cannot be prejudiced without being ignorant.” – Modern Romanticism To be anti-racist would have to mean to be anti-ignorance. However, how can one be anti of an absence, pertaining to ignorance, without broadening the void? Instead, to make the error of relating prejudice to hatred, would
-
“Being brought low means to be displayed as related to the utilitarian prospects for a person. In using an object, one becomes an object. In a society where function is the value, where we complain of objectification, there is no preservation. In devouring another, we become devoured ourselves. What has changed in this world, except
-
“Why love has no function, is to know that nothing loved is seen for its use. Betrayal, and then, the realization for our fragility, being of pain, is the result of being used. Forgetfulness, being of no love, though only the lust that partakes of the gain and the usage. If a person complies to
-
“To the limitation of a resource, is not to the eternal place of love. We cannot relate the offering of a resource, as money or medication, to love. We cannot, because the two differ in that the former is limited, whereas the latter is unlimited. A resource cannot compare to love nor to compassion.” –
-
“Were convenience to be the thing of care, then we will treat the human life as one. Whether them to be deemed as convenient or inconvenient is only suited towards what drives utility to prove itself as akin to slavery. If an individual rebels, they are the inconvenience. If an individual complies, they are simply
-
“Function complies to its limitation. A resource is no more the dependency than the life for which is also limited in its temporary aspect. How does a society rely on what is never genuine in where it is meant to be? As convenience never lives on, then it does not correspond with something said to
Modern Romanticism 