Quote – “Why Respect is Objectively Earned” – 9/21/2020

“Were a person to believe respect as automatic, then they confuse it for love. It is always that a person wishes to be noticed, making them inevitably in yearning for love. Respect, however, is always earned, because were it not, we could respect anyone. We could loosely ‘respect’ the psychopath, and their ways. We could loosely ‘respect’ the pedophile, and their ways. To love any sadist, merely means to utilize criticism that would indeed back the imperfect person from their faults, to a time when they weren’t faulted. In this sense, love turns the imperfection to a perfection.”

– Modern Romanticism

Philosophy – “Identity Politics, the same as Monarchal Bloodlines” – 9/12/2020

“Written in the ways of purism, is the idea that one blood is inferior, or lacking in quality, over another. To base politics around race, around gender, around creed, is to recede to the aristocracy mentality, though swapped. It is to say that impurity is purity. Perhaps it is that we are all the same, though not in the way everyone wants.”

– Modern Romanticism

Who is pure, in this world of worlds? Who can say whether one person has more in-depth understanding to their “self-discovery”, over another? Who is purer, to another, whose bloodline, whether crossed or stagnant, is only ever different?

It can continually return to the idea that a person, whose bloodline is only different, can be made brand new. Of a bloodline, brand new, it is the same as a bloodline, pure. It is the same as to see something more divisive than any aristocrat, who had power in the past, could make for competition’s sake. For do these people with their “identity” not relate to very obscure bloodlines, so alien from the common man?

All a person knows, so well of themselves, is that they can bleed, just like anyone else.

“Identity politics” is, therefore, an exact relation to aristocracy, in terms of the curiosity for the potency of blood. We can comprehend our ancestry, through a simple “Google search”. Whereas, in the past, we knew it by whoever had sexual intercourse with a woman. We can dig so deep in the past, to discover our identity’s “potential”, and then, become proud of who we are. For to be proud of who we are, is no different than any tyrant who would want to appear good, rather than do good.

The love of blood, is the love of making a statement. And, when do we become the vampires, who like Elizabeth Bathory, drenched herself in a virgin’s own? We do so, by accumulating newness. We make new bloodlines, discovering percentages of ourselves in our supposed “ancestry”. Again, in the pride of who we are, we forget to be proud for what we can do. That makes us ruling tyrants, that without the offered shame for this identity, we can conceal guilt.

People can be wounded, not of guilt, though for pride. Though, whenever will we give in, to a guilt that tells us we have bled others, for the sake of keeping what we most know of ourselves? We have bled other people’s pride, not ever giving in to this guilt we know we feel. Because, for how sour an aristocratic person’s expression can be, we overlook our guilt for how much we bleed. We put to death, another person and their supposed guilt, whether at the stake or at the hanging. To burn, or to choke, is the only punishment a person with a supposed sin, can receive.

It is to those that know we all bleed, that make those who are so vain for their identity, released of their head from their shoulders. Yet, they’ll still run around without intelligence, without recognition, and without identity. Because, as they believe in blood, the rest believes in sameness. The common man believes in same blood, same identity.

Consume the offered shame. Feel your inner guilt. Punish yourself.

Philosophy – “Beauty Exists to be Fragile, to Love’s Non-Existence” – 7/27/2020

“All love is not delicate, ever on its own. On its own, it is waiting to create. To imagine the universe as infinite, is to believe in love the same. All beauty is delicate to its creator. All beauty is shaped by hands so unseen, while through our submission, we allow them to mold us.”

– Modern Romanticism

Each human is beautiful, delicate to the control of love. The non-existence of love, is believed in, to be existent by the existence of beauty. For this means that each thing that can be broken, is beautiful. Each thing that can be destroyed, is protected by love.

Each beautiful thing upon this world has form, has shape, and can be broken. The mind cannot truly be broken, so long as love is wanted. By the mind, love is wanted, for the repair of it. For that will occur in an instant. Whatever torment the mind suffers will be immediately relieved through love. It is the mind that is indirectly in torment, while the body is directly in its suffering. As in, the body represents the honesty of a person, while the mind represents the dishonesty or mystery of a person. As scientists have said, the mind is the last to go, upon the body’s death. It is due to that the mind is transferring its memories to the next world, where the soul goes.

Attempt to resurrect the form, and it will be literally reborn, without recollection of who it was during its first life. No human can be “resurrected” without being “reset” the same way a machine is. It is as Christ, who upon his own resurrection, knew he must be called to Heaven. It is because that where he belonged, knowing his “Holy Spirit” was with his Father. It must be the case that all dead humans, among each memory to their mind, exists in “Heaven”. The realm where the dead go, or where the memories go, and perhaps relived.

All love upon this world to everything beautiful, is a non-existence before it becomes an existence. Though, only because love was believed in, that this occurs, can beauty ever be protected by it.

Each thing of a shape, of a form, can be broken. Therefore, it can be protected by something infinitely more supreme in wisdom, and in guidance, so that it does not break. For it is that the mind to a fragile form, can do unwise maneuvers and decisions, so that the body breaks. If the body breaks, then the mind was merely without wisdom. Without wisdom, a person acts in the stupid manner to let their body become broken. For how does a person live on, without knowing the love from another? No person upon this world understands love, without receiving it.

Quote – “Why Vulnerability is the Key to Strength” – 7/23/2020

“Think of the mind as related to the muscles, when we exercise to break down the fibers so that our limbs can grow stronger after rest. To be vulnerable, is in the same idea. We operate on a choice that breaks us down, only for us to grow when we rest, when we contemplate on the consequences. That is called being responsible. That is called being mature.

When we encounter any trial in our lives, to do anything that requires risk, we break ourselves open upon the task before us. Like an egg, we crack ourselves open upon what we face. In being vulnerable during those moments, we are soon to grow when we repair ourselves, either through what we took a risk in, or when we are betrayed. Because, like muscles, we grow stronger after we rest, after we have been broken down.”

– Modern Romanticism

Quote – “Of Objective Ugliness” – 7/21/2020

“Beauty has no way to improve, without love. Without the care that goes into repairing wounds, being on the flesh of a beautiful form, there will be objective ugliness. For ugliness is made objective, opposite from what is beautiful, due to the innate knowledge that what has been made ugly, has been without love, been without care. For to love, would mean to love beauty. We perceive ugliness in its objective fashion when we comprehend that what is ugly has been neglected. It is the same when we see a child, emaciated upon the roadway, starving to death without caregivers. We say to it that it is a sorry sight, an ugly sight, because the child has been neglected.”

– Modern Romanticism

Quote – “An Example to why Love Dominates Lust” – 7/19/2020

“If one can comprehend with ease, that the mind controls the human form of arms and legs, like a puppeteer controlling their puppet, then it should be easily comprehended that love controls lust. By that meaning, it is the mind being of love, that dominates the form being of lust. Love dominates lust, by the mind using what is always the tool. Though, in that, it is to say that the mind will protect the form, by controlling it to never perform the unwise decision. By the mind or love, dominating the body or lust, is to state that what loves protects what is weak. For the body is like lightning, to be gone, in an instant, at the stupid mind that controlled the obedient form. As the mind leads the form, it is always love that should lead the headless sheep in the herd.”

– Modern Romanticism

Quote – “Love is not Quantity” – 7/14/2020

“One cannot mass produce quality. Such is physically impossible. For the average human does not understand quality, as much as they understand ‘the craving’. A human craves, to benefit their body. It is that the form can be the only thing mass produced. Were the mind mass produced, it would be the same as love mass produced. Such is, as well, physically impossible, because love is not even physical. It is metaphysical, meaning that it cannot be constructed, or even what constructs the self. It it what constructs another person, in the gift.

Love is the quality, whereas lust is the quantity. We are not attracted by love, at first glance, as much as attraction relates to lust. It is the number, before it splits off from the rest. Then, it becomes attached to us, in a oneness of knowledge, being of the mind.

Love must be the brief spark of lust, at first glance to another, making the challenge to see that one as either among the rest, or apart from the rest.”

– Modern Romanticism

Psychology – “Of a Man’s Need for Oneness, to a Woman’s Craving for Mass” – 5/18/2020

Is it not accurate to put that a woman, especially as we see her in today’s time, speaks aloud about the word “choice”? Choice, as it should be seen, relates directly to the words “diversity” and “number”. When in a shop, we are presented with choices. When a woman was liberated from the household, she was presented with the two words “choice” and “opportunity”. All of these things feed into an inevitable way with a woman, to see numbers, as she may have, in olden days, see many children.

Is it not accurate to put that a man can, for a woman, offer her the oneness that disposes of such materialism? It is not also what Christianity speaks of about God, naming God to be both male and a father? If it is proven, not even from a religious point-of-view, that a woman craves choice and independence, then it is inevitably a man who wants for oneness. Why is that? It is because oneness relates to a beginning. A woman cannot any longer want for numbers, if loyalty has already directed itself upon her. Abandonment is something most potent for a woman. Any woman can feel the abandonment of a man’s heart, as that heart can somehow be related to God’s own, because his physical presence is all that is around.

How is it not objectively true that a woman’s addiction to a “wide variety” of assets and resources, relates to how much she has, in today’s world, been disconnected from oneness? It seems to be, that when a woman is disconnected from oneness, being offered by a man, she is connected to the numerous. When a woman rejects the union within marriage, she automatically seems to embrace the numerous choices offered in the world. From this, it seems that a woman’s psychology only offers her either oneness or the numerous, as either union or division, as either love or fear.

What of that oneness, of that creation, of that unity?

Creation. Creation relates to a seed. A seed relates to a sperm cell, when only one ever gets to the egg. Oneness. That is the beginning of something. It is the beginning of life. For a woman, a man makes oneness, and keeps her collected. It is what defines loyalty only from a man to a woman, because were it not, then perhaps multiple seeds would be in competition to create a beginning. It is the case, at first, when a million sperm cells race to the egg. Yet, when one gets there, it has been inaugurated into leadership. Leadership. That is the oneness. The collection, the gathering of a population, to be unified. Perhaps this is the objective reason why a man desired a son, in the past.

If that is not enough, then why is the infant meant to be born head-first? See the head as the leader, as Christianity sees God as the head, and you will find Atheism to be full of ignorance.

When is it not written in a mournful love song that a woman sees herself too incapable, when once in that relationship, to ever keep the man close to her? Yet, a woman feels “capable” without a man, among the “numerous” that she clings to. Multiple magazine subscriptions, many celebrities voices to hear and gain advice from, podcasts to listen to… the list goes on.

A woman feels abandonment, like the star in the universe among the millions spread across, never chosen. Can one easily see God collecting the stars, like a woman collects children? If so, then a man will see all women as his children, if only for there to be one to truly love. Perhaps that is also the reason why a man desires a son, not a daughter, because what point is there to see another face of his beloved wife? That confusion merely sets apart the oneness within the definition of love.

A man is challenged to gather the weak together, if only to create that oneness through the love that creates the unity.

A Quote of Wisdom – “Of Scientific Assimilation” – 4/20/2020

“When it comes to assimilation, it comes to the gathering of flesh, the gathering of subjects, the ‘gathering of opinions’, or even the gathering of votes, such people are continually observed by scientific eyes. What has this to do with the tool? A tool, being of direct opposite contrast to a human treated with an individual mind or with intellect, has much to do with those who can be used or replaced. One objectively loves a human for their mind, not for their form. Should one claim to love a human for their form, they are only feeling sorry for the damage done unto it.

The tool is always damaged if one does not take proper care of it.”

A Quote of Wisdom – “The Metaphysics of a Relationship” – 3/20/2020

How is a woman beautiful?

She is beautiful, by not focusing on what will repel a man to be attracted to her. Her form, that is, because by not focusing so much on it, she places no shield between herself and a potential partner.

Beauty has only one place in the world: attraction. That attraction can make the abusive man come to destroy it. However, it could also create the attraction enough for a man to come to protect it.

A physical relationship possesses no feeling. Lust does not create the feelings that will speak of an eternity with the chosen partner. Love is metaphysical, not physical, and there are no differing perspectives on this. To prove it, comprehend what a body is. It is a mass of flesh. It is a shield, or a wall, and with much focus from a woman, makes her a barricade against attraction. She reinforces herself, enough so that such a form of hers, cannot be vulnerable.

One may say that the sex in a physical relationship possesses enough feeling. Though, is it not like a dying spark? It raises as an inferno, until it dies down quickly to a mere few cold embers.

Lust is the essence of toying with the physical. When a woman, who sees herself to be beautiful, as most do, or want to, will not ever be beautiful through continual dissatisfaction over appearance. Through intellect, however, a woman is able to become extraordinarily beautiful, because her second nature becomes her beauty.

The mind is only capable of possessing one primary focus, and one secondary focus. This means that should the form becomes the primary focus, then the mind is neglected. And, since the form is physical, then it also represents “what is visible”, and so what is invisible, being the mind, inevitably deteriorates.

Intellect deteriorates, when the form is so much the focus. We see, in today’s world, such a prominent focus on a woman’s form, though should she focus on intellect, then her form will become like a cloud. That is, for a man to pass through it, because she has not focused so much on it, that it no longer looks like an ugly barricade. In focusing on her intellect, she proposes attraction to a man. And, the protectors win, in this sense. They will always win, because beauty should not reinforce itself. To imagine it like the land of a nation being uninhabitable, acting of its own accord to directly destroy any trace of civilization, would we want this?

A man, who is devoted to love, lives in a woman. Then, she lives in whatever he has constructed, with his own hands.

Still don’t believe these words? Then, why have relationships “fallen apart”, because the recent movements for women have encouraged her to gather herself together? They enforce strength through those who are inherently vulnerable, because the very inevitable aspect behind relationships and an organism’s reproduction, is to be attracted to what has been seduced enough to not fight back. Why have the divorce rates skyrocketed, if not because beauty has strengthened herself so much, that men have a hard time understanding a woman?

Essay Concept: – “To See Past the Form to Inner Beauty” – 3/19/2020

  • To see past the form, means for someone to be able to see another person’s intellect. This means, that should the subconscious hold its focus for the form, then the conscious will hold its focus for the mind, in the person wishing to be seen.
  • When that person is seen, their form is not seen, because what is held in focus, by the wishful person, is their mind. Meaning, that what is “seen” is something invisible. That is, when seeing past the form, what is seen is that invisible something, being the intellect of the wishful person. Any person wishing to be seen for their “inner beauty”, must have a conscious focus on their mind and intellect, so that those who see them, will not have to focus on something that places itself like a barrier, being the form.
  • For a form is a wall of flesh, and anything that presents itself as physical or visible, will block the way to the metaphysical or invisible. Thus, when the conscious focus becomes the mind, then the subconscious focus becomes the form, making the form easily passable, and the mind easy to be seen. Therefore, from this, there is the delving into “inner beauty” that many people wish for others to see.

A Quote of Wisdom – “Why Nudity Stuns Us” – 3/8/2020

“Flesh is the representation of truth. Uncovered, it compels us to turn away from it, because everything that is about truth, is something revealed. For the same reason as anyone cannot look directly at the sun, things that are ‘revealed’ represent light, not darkness.”