Political Philosophy – “The Reason for Student Debt” – 11/7/2021

“How can one be so creative, yet be negligent of their decaying heart? How can one be so rich for their depth in pockets, yet so poor of soul?”

– Modern Romanticism

There is this divide, between the creative and the practical work. What holds form and what holds function, though this is a needed divide when considering both a person’s monetary status and their levels of ennui and listlessness. A person’s courage to conquer what is needed for survival, though cannot be sufficient when their objective is to create with what flows from the heart. A person’s heart, a person’s individualism is them. To this, there is no heart, unless such is shattered. Although, out of sadness, there is more creativity. Is it that “sadness is the wellspring of creativity”, as such is sometimes told? Then, the pain of a loss, of something once felt will not cease creativity.

A student, upon their academic achievements, should do such for the practical, though will want to enter in a field where they might exercise their individualism. If that student understands the division between form and function, they will stick to monetary gain upon the latter. They will exercise their individualism upon the former. They will reveal as they will show. They will not simply tell the reason for their life. They will prove it. Though, upon reaching debt, what slows the student? What raises the awareness to seek student debt forgiveness? It must be that the student thought, upon the notions of a changing environment, that their creative individualism could mount the place of function or practicality. What is creative loses soul upon the desire for monetary gathering. Upon losing soul, one loses creativity. One loses themselves upon the thought that they are still creative, within a collective field. There is no creativity within collectivism. It is inherently the case, when one can understand the same divide between form and function. When one knows that form belongs in individualism, due to the weight in which form displays, one knows collectivism and function as a weightless nothingness.

However, one perhaps must be, at first, a nothing to become something. Out of the practical world, a person becomes. One becomes, though within individualist creativity to the form, one is. As in, one is themselves, through creativity. Whereas, one becomes another thing through professional and mechanical collectivism and function. The aspect of one’s skills resonates with collectivism, though were built upon who a person is within individualism. It is to mean that collectivism cannot function without the form of individualism. Collectivism depends on individualism.

If a student means to create among an environment of function, they will lose. If a student means to be functional among an environment where they can create, they will gain. Form follows function when a person holds the delusion that function should be first within the march to progress. Function follows form when a person realizes that truth often leads to its distortion, being deception. Such of the latter design requires simple correction, though the student is in debt because of what they’ve lost in the monetary sense. A student is in debt, because they have believed it possible to create within function. They are a mere victim to the Post-Modern realm, of one that seeks to impoverish the heart for the sake of monetary forgiveness. The prime issue with this is that debt of the monetary sort cannot be forgiven forever. Eternal forgiveness of such material debt is not possible due to the greater value in forgiving an understood mistake. What has the creator lost, in this sense? They have lost their ability to forgive the true transgressions upon themselves, being to sacrifice heart and soul for monetary achievement.

Individualism does not function, though is what is the form to what becomes of the function. Whether they be the continued existence of the destruction of what is function, depends solely on the individualist. That is, collectivism can do no more than to rebel against itself. Function does no more than to rebel against or deny the existence of its own creator. The inescapable factor is of what cannot be forgiven from student to their true loss, being of their individualism. A person or student that means to forsake individualism is one who will be in eternal debt always expecting repeated forgiveness.

Philosophy – “Why Post-Modernism Causes Poverty” – 4/15/2021

“That which is beautiful cannot be seen for the grime in what is impoverished. An abstraction can be to such a word, in being impoverished, though to be simply lacking. As poverty has its meaning upon what is lost, then beauty will be for what is gained.”

– Modern Romanticism

Post-Modernism has comprehended one thing: that the greater to be practical overcomes what is ever only deemed as beautiful. Yet, it is never the preservation of a creation, relating so much to life and to truth, that whatever is hideous will ever be. To the things only ever deemed as useful, their preservation shall come as limited. Would we treat life this way? Are we to treat all creation in this manner, even of art to the abandoned child?

We cannot treat art as any different than life. Both are creations. To either’s preservation, we are not meant to comprehend the useful or practical as needed for its extension. How do we preserve the food? We do, until it is eaten. How do we preserve life? It is by sacrificing what is meant to disappear, being the material.

From the immaterial to the material, there is art or creation for the former and there is the useful or the practical for the latter. Neither art, nor life, nor truth is meant to be confused as material. It is forever. If buried, then it is alive beneath the figurative earth.

It is the beautiful that is meant to be preserved, relating to life. Beautiful life does not compare to hideous death, nor the trampled impoverished. The impoverished are hideous, as that is just one bitter truth. No matter the taste, one must swallow all meaning to truth. For that is because it is the sweet sort of medicines that resonate as deception, not truth.

Being beautiful, one has lived. One has ascended past poverty. In truth, a comprehension for life not being among the dust, and then one has made themselves beautiful and whole in awareness.

If not Post-Modernism, then love.

If Post-Modernism, then let decay.

Quote – “Science is…” – 12/8/2020

“Science is not the encouragement of wisdom, in terms of teaching all to learn from their mistakes. Rather, science teaches us to learn from someone else’s mistakes, to gain benefits from someone else’s misfortune.”

– Modern Romanticism

Philosophy – “The Necessity of Structure within Art” – 2/17/2020

The necessity of structure within art, comes with the many details one can pour within the piece, and still keep it standing. Without structure, what one has to worth with, becomes minimalist and small.

It is like a building. Without much structure, what will be worked with, will eventually fall apart.

Post-Modernism does not work with structure, and completely negates the need for structure and detail, to show what can actually hold.

Without structure, we have the opposite from it, being deconstruction. Thus, we have the Deconstructionists of a bygone age, full of people who resisted Tradition to a radical extreme. By this, it is meant to be known, still, that without structure, one’s society reaches its limits.

Structure has an element to it, and it is necessary to be repeated, that a “structure” only ever appears impressive, when the details are numerous enough so that the structure can still stand.

Eliminate structure, and anything you’ve built that is not based on structure, will tumble.

It is why you have micro-poetry and other works that express a minimalist side to the artist. Such writing and other art possesses no structure, and because such works are very small, it is only due to that one has very little to work with, to even begin the piece. It is all because the art lacks structure. Should one begin to add more detail, then one’s piece becomes more impressive, through the structure, because it still stands.

What will be even more fated to occur, is that one will eventually work with dust, to make art, having formed the deconstruction to everything.