Mind – Modern Romanticism

Philosophy – “Beauty Exists to be Fragile, to Love’s Non-Existence” – 7/27/2020

“All love is not delicate, ever on its own. On its own, it is waiting to create. To imagine the universe as infinite, is to believe in love the same. All beauty is delicate to its creator. All beauty is shaped by hands so unseen, while through our submission, we allow them to mold us.”
– Modern Romanticism

Each human is beautiful, delicate to the control of love. The non-existence of love, is believed in, to be existent by the existence of beauty. For this means that each thing that can be broken, is beautiful. Each thing that can be destroyed, is protected by love.

Each beautiful thing upon this world has form, has shape, and can be broken. The mind cannot truly be broken, so long as love is wanted. By the mind, love is wanted, for the repair of it. For that will occur in an instant. Whatever torment the mind suffers will be immediately relieved through love. It is the mind that is indirectly in torment, while the body is directly in its suffering. As in, the body represents the honesty of a person, while the mind represents the dishonesty or mystery of a person. As scientists have said, the mind is the last to go, upon the body’s death. It is due to that the mind is transferring its memories to the next world, where the soul goes.

Attempt to resurrect the form, and it will be literally reborn, without recollection of who it was during its first life. No human can be “resurrected” without being “reset” the same way a machine is. It is as Christ, who upon his own resurrection, knew he must be called to Heaven. It is because that where he belonged, knowing his “Holy Spirit” was with his Father. It must be the case that all dead humans, among each memory to their mind, exists in “Heaven”. The realm where the dead go, or where the memories go, and perhaps relived.

All love upon this world to everything beautiful, is a non-existence before it becomes an existence. Though, only because love was believed in, that this occurs, can beauty ever be protected by it.

Each thing of a shape, of a form, can be broken. Therefore, it can be protected by something infinitely more supreme in wisdom, and in guidance, so that it does not break. For it is that the mind to a fragile form, can do unwise maneuvers and decisions, so that the body breaks. If the body breaks, then the mind was merely without wisdom. Without wisdom, a person acts in the stupid manner to let their body become broken. For how does a person live on, without knowing the love from another? No person upon this world understands love, without receiving it.

Quote – “Why Vulnerability is the Key to Strength” – 7/23/2020

“Think of the mind as related to the muscles, when we exercise to break down the fibers so that our limbs can grow stronger after rest. To be vulnerable, is in the same idea. We operate on a choice that breaks us down, only for us to grow when we rest, when we contemplate on the consequences. That is called being responsible. That is called being mature.
When we encounter any trial in our lives, to do anything that requires risk, we break ourselves open upon the task before us. Like an egg, we crack ourselves open upon what we face. In being vulnerable during those moments, we are soon to grow when we repair ourselves, either through what we took a risk in, or when we are betrayed. Because, like muscles, we grow stronger after we rest, after we have been broken down.”
– Modern Romanticism

Quote – “An Example to why Love Dominates Lust” – 7/19/2020

“If one can comprehend with ease, that the mind controls the human form of arms and legs, like a puppeteer controlling their puppet, then it should be easily comprehended that love controls lust. By that meaning, it is the mind being of love, that dominates the form being of lust. Love dominates lust, by the mind using what is always the tool. Though, in that, it is to say that the mind will protect the form, by controlling it to never perform the unwise decision. By the mind or love, dominating the body or lust, is to state that what loves protects what is weak. For the body is like lightning, to be gone, in an instant, at the stupid mind that controlled the obedient form. As the mind leads the form, it is always love that should lead the headless sheep in the herd.”
– Modern Romanticism

Quote – “Love is not Quantity” – 7/14/2020

“One cannot mass produce quality. Such is physically impossible. For the average human does not understand quality, as much as they understand ‘the craving’. A human craves, to benefit their body. It is that the form can be the only thing mass produced. Were the mind mass produced, it would be the same as love mass produced. Such is, as well, physically impossible, because love is not even physical. It is metaphysical, meaning that it cannot be constructed, or even what constructs the self. It it what constructs another person, in the gift.
Love is the quality, whereas lust is the quantity. We are not attracted by love, at first glance, as much as attraction relates to lust. It is the number, before it splits off from the rest. Then, it becomes attached to us, in a oneness of knowledge, being of the mind.
Love must be the brief spark of lust, at first glance to another, making the challenge to see that one as either among the rest, or apart from the rest.”
– Modern Romanticism

Psychology – “Of a Man’s Need for Oneness, to a Woman’s Craving for Mass” – 5/18/2020

Is it not accurate to put that a woman, especially as we see her in today’s time, speaks aloud about the word “choice”? Choice, as it should be seen, relates directly to the words “diversity” and “number”. When in a shop, we are presented with choices. When a woman was liberated from the household, she was presented with the two words “choice” and “opportunity”. All of these things feed into an inevitable way with a woman, to see numbers, as she may have, in olden days, see many children.

Is it not accurate to put that a man can, for a woman, offer her the oneness that disposes of such materialism? It is not also what Christianity speaks of about God, naming God to be both male and a father? If it is proven, not even from a religious point-of-view, that a woman craves choice and independence, then it is inevitably a man who wants for oneness. Why is that? It is because oneness relates to a beginning. A woman cannot any longer want for numbers, if loyalty has already directed itself upon her. Abandonment is something most potent for a woman. Any woman can feel the abandonment of a man’s heart, as that heart can somehow be related to God’s own, because his physical presence is all that is around.

How is it not objectively true that a woman’s addiction to a “wide variety” of assets and resources, relates to how much she has, in today’s world, been disconnected from oneness? It seems to be, that when a woman is disconnected from oneness, being offered by a man, she is connected to the numerous. When a woman rejects the union within marriage, she automatically seems to embrace the numerous choices offered in the world. From this, it seems that a woman’s psychology only offers her either oneness or the numerous, as either union or division, as either love or fear.

What of that oneness, of that creation, of that unity?

Creation. Creation relates to a seed. A seed relates to a sperm cell, when only one ever gets to the egg. Oneness. That is the beginning of something. It is the beginning of life. For a woman, a man makes oneness, and keeps her collected. It is what defines loyalty only from a man to a woman, because were it not, then perhaps multiple seeds would be in competition to create a beginning. It is the case, at first, when a million sperm cells race to the egg. Yet, when one gets there, it has been inaugurated into leadership. Leadership. That is the oneness. The collection, the gathering of a population, to be unified. Perhaps this is the objective reason why a man desired a son, in the past.

If that is not enough, then why is the infant meant to be born head-first? See the head as the leader, as Christianity sees God as the head, and you will find Atheism to be full of ignorance.

When is it not written in a mournful love song that a woman sees herself too incapable, when once in that relationship, to ever keep the man close to her? Yet, a woman feels “capable” without a man, among the “numerous” that she clings to. Multiple magazine subscriptions, many celebrities voices to hear and gain advice from, podcasts to listen to… the list goes on.

A woman feels abandonment, like the star in the universe among the millions spread across, never chosen. Can one easily see God collecting the stars, like a woman collects children? If so, then a man will see all women as his children, if only for there to be one to truly love. Perhaps that is also the reason why a man desires a son, not a daughter, because what point is there to see another face of his beloved wife? That confusion merely sets apart the oneness within the definition of love.

A man is challenged to gather the weak together, if only to create that oneness through the love that creates the unity.

A Quote of Wisdom – “Of Scientific Assimilation” – 4/20/2020

“When it comes to assimilation, it comes to the gathering of flesh, the gathering of subjects, the ‘gathering of opinions’, or even the gathering of votes, such people are continually observed by scientific eyes. What has this to do with the tool? A tool, being of direct opposite contrast to a human treated with an individual mind or with intellect, has much to do with those who can be used or replaced. One objectively loves a human for their mind, not for their form. Should one claim to love a human for their form, they are only feeling sorry for the damage done unto it.
The tool is always damaged if one does not take proper care of it.”

Poem – “The Heart Holds little Control” – Romance – 4/12/2020

I thought with life upon a wire,
I could aim a little higher.
Force me behind a cage
For I should never sway
With you in arms, ever again.
I am without control,
Just the beast with nothing to hold
But his own entrails,
His guilt,
His form that has scarred the landscape
By simply being here.
Please let me lay alone
In the open dark
To see the day put to death,
To see life raised to breath
Without my existence on its open wings.
A heart, below,
A mind, above.
I wired you with the entanglement of your veins,
I caged myself in the open air,
While feeling what shame beauty felt
Knowing that I held nothing but my insanity.

Novel Opening Practice – “The Thought of a Heart Healed” – 4/8/2020

All that appears to be broken, can somehow be fixed. Although, all that has been broken of a heart, cannot be mended, if impossible. Do not repair what rips the wound open, further.

Please, if you may, ascertain the fallen leaves for their cast shadows. Know the pain by the many wounds. Your droplets will only create rivers beneath eyes, and not breathe the whole ocean into a void. Draw upon mercy as though it were your final sliver of wisdom, for your attempt to heal is an attempt to hurt.

Poem – “Worthy is your Presence” – Romance – 4/8/2020

Only when I weep
Do I feel tears that truly stick
To cheeks made of the same pallidity
As the stones above your grave.
Cry more, will I?
To the open winds, that scream back the same verse
I jot down, upon paper of some pale ocean
That feels my fallen tears.
I have loved with a heart that would not part
The red sea of my clouded storm.
Above and beyond the rainbow
That only sheens when you come to scream.
Scream with me, all words made from the coals
That cover me, in my frailty.
Give me the same death, the same peace
You have used, to laugh your way away from me.

A Quote of Wisdom – “A Translation of a Simple Perspective” – 4/5/2020

“Upon many occasions, I have observed that a perspective only ever holds a candle to itself. Of course, this is true, when we consider what a perspective is. But I believe a perspective can be taken seriously, almost as if it were a fact. At what point does a mere ‘perspective’ become proven to be a fact? This is what I aim to find out. When did the person who invented the numerical and digits turn their meager ‘perspective’ into something inarguable? To say of the perspective or the opinion, that it is only the perspective or the opinion, seems like a blow to intellectualism. We will say that one is ‘forcing’ their opinions or their ways upon another, but then again, a child will say the same when he or she believes they don’t need to attend school. Life is about open-mindedness, and the flexibility of intellect makes a person thrive, when alive. Nothing else matters, but the person to learn, and to gather what one can know from listening to others. Therefore, a perspective is not just a perspective, but an outlook upon reality.”

A Quote of Wisdom – “The Metaphysics of a Relationship” – 3/20/2020

How is a woman beautiful?
She is beautiful, by not focusing on what will repel a man to be attracted to her. Her form, that is, because by not focusing so much on it, she places no shield between herself and a potential partner.
Beauty has only one place in the world: attraction. That attraction can make the abusive man come to destroy it. However, it could also create the attraction enough for a man to come to protect it.
A physical relationship possesses no feeling. Lust does not create the feelings that will speak of an eternity with the chosen partner. Love is metaphysical, not physical, and there are no differing perspectives on this. To prove it, comprehend what a body is. It is a mass of flesh. It is a shield, or a wall, and with much focus from a woman, makes her a barricade against attraction. She reinforces herself, enough so that such a form of hers, cannot be vulnerable.
One may say that the sex in a physical relationship possesses enough feeling. Though, is it not like a dying spark? It raises as an inferno, until it dies down quickly to a mere few cold embers.
Lust is the essence of toying with the physical. When a woman, who sees herself to be beautiful, as most do, or want to, will not ever be beautiful through continual dissatisfaction over appearance. Through intellect, however, a woman is able to become extraordinarily beautiful, because her second nature becomes her beauty.
The mind is only capable of possessing one primary focus, and one secondary focus. This means that should the form becomes the primary focus, then the mind is neglected. And, since the form is physical, then it also represents “what is visible”, and so what is invisible, being the mind, inevitably deteriorates.
Intellect deteriorates, when the form is so much the focus. We see, in today’s world, such a prominent focus on a woman’s form, though should she focus on intellect, then her form will become like a cloud. That is, for a man to pass through it, because she has not focused so much on it, that it no longer looks like an ugly barricade. In focusing on her intellect, she proposes attraction to a man. And, the protectors win, in this sense. They will always win, because beauty should not reinforce itself. To imagine it like the land of a nation being uninhabitable, acting of its own accord to directly destroy any trace of civilization, would we want this?
A man, who is devoted to love, lives in a woman. Then, she lives in whatever he has constructed, with his own hands.
Still don’t believe these words? Then, why have relationships “fallen apart”, because the recent movements for women have encouraged her to gather herself together? They enforce strength through those who are inherently vulnerable, because the very inevitable aspect behind relationships and an organism’s reproduction, is to be attracted to what has been seduced enough to not fight back. Why have the divorce rates skyrocketed, if not because beauty has strengthened herself so much, that men have a hard time understanding a woman?

A Quote of Wisdom – “Why Love is more Important than Food and Water” – 3/6/2020

“If the human form can exist for more than 3 weeks without food, what with Gandhi starving himself for 21 days, then it is water that the human form needs more than physical sustenance.
To compare all of this to metaphorical attributes, the ‘food’ represents the the physical, while the ‘water’ represents the half-way between physical and metaphysical. Love would have to represent the metaphysical, or the non-existent.
Non-existent, meaning, that love has no physical form, on its own. Love would have to represent shelter, or something we cannot consume. By having no physical form, means only that shelter holds within itself, vulnerable individuals. It would not make sense for shelter to be sheltered. Shelter cannot be consumed, and is more important than food or water.
From an objective standpoint, this is true. In old and survivalist times, one needed shelter, before hunting for game, or finding clean water to drink.
Compare love to shelter. See then, that the form, which is a representation of beauty, will die the fastest without shelter. This would prove it to be objective that love can only be external as something where one is led into, and that ‘self-love’ is merely Narcissism.”