Summer Project – “A Two-Step Sequence to Problem Solving – From Delicate Heart to Resourceful Mind” – Chapter 1/50 – “To Define Order” – 5/28/2021

It is order that encompasses what does not, or should not, divide. A responsible person will comprehend order, since to divide oneself from it is to forsake what it means to earn one’s freedom. That is to say that to be ordered, even of the self, is to comprehend that one cannot be given freedom, because to earn it is to understand that one is no longer a slave. To be considered free, or to be freed out of one’s own doing to that station, is the very difference between something stagnant and what must be done.

To see a goodness in the word “freedom”, though never pertain it to order, is with the mindset of believing the former should be gifted through chaos. That is the endeavor of the person who misunderstands that to earn freedom, in its relation to how a person is ordered to the correction of themselves, is to have displaced the self from previous wrongdoing. A wrongdoing that, by example, would have a person incarcerated for an improper action, will make of the individual and only them needing to comprehend personal responsibility. It is in this case, or otherwise the wrongdoer will commit the same objective mistake, over again.

Mistakes become known to be objective, out of the person who realize their inabilities. To be incapable, is to know one is not meant to commit themselves to a certain action that would bring about mistakes. It is in a person’s uncontrolled and unhindered ambitions that causes them to forsake accountability, for the desperate attempt to make a reality out of a delusional epiphany. Since through uncontrolled ambition, a person becomes delusional, it is then through such idealistic actions that a person merely reveals human flaw.

Upon the notion of inability, there is the stance for where resources are met, through where the mind stores them. By a person unable to be responsible is then to comprehend that their uncontrolled spending of resources is to misunderstand what is limited of chaos, out of disregard for order of the heart. If the heart is ordered, then it is not broken to express the flaws of humanity. Humans are always mistaken because it is of humanity, itself, that is represented as a mistake. Were one to speak of themselves to love as a mistake, then they’ve yet to comprehend that it is always through trust, not of love, that causes such a person to error themselves and to reveal flaw.

We can be shameless when we blindly trust, being for resources spent of the mind. Though, we cannot at all be shameless through blind love, that to the heart, is where holds its residence. This depiction of the heart is all by what can be broken, being in relation to human emotions that are the sole source behind all mistakes. A person to make a mistake was through emotions, and nothing more.

Upon all mistakes, it is to be argued that when society is in disarray and unordered, it had always been through the individual’s lack of understanding to the self, as their trust had been gifted to others too readily. Would trust then, as its gift for another, be in comparison to the prior notion of believing freedom is meant to be the same? As a gift, though if freedom and trust are said to be gifted, then it is where we place ourselves, or our fragilities, that we become imprisoned without awareness for personal responsibility.

It is the responsible self who is most willing to comprehend order, as it is its opposite, being of chaos, that represents the dishonest and untruthful self. In being responsible, admittance to the committed mistake is the first step on the path towards reconciliation. Nothing else reveals itself as more dishonest than the one keeping themselves incarcerated, whether within the literal prison or the mental one. Due to the repeated offender’s wish to forgo responsibility, it becomes identified as the repetition of a mistake. Repeated mistakes are like mass production, by itself believed to be perfect in design, though inevitably flawed. Such a perception for what is deemed to be perfect is just as the mentality of the dishonest, irresponsible person who is unable to comprehend the meaning of a mistake. It is that it will be repeated, or mass produced, if irresponsibility resonates with the person of such a nature through sheer negligence, as they mean to expose themselves to the spending for more flawed designs.

The designs for what are flawed is continually by the touch of human hands, marking our creations as never perfect. As perfection would fall alongside omniscience, then nothing more would be learned, especially of what has been created as a mistake.

Maintenance and preservation are upon the foundations to what reveals itself as objective order, being to the individual who has comprehended the self only ever through perceiving incapability. The flaw of a human is how a lesson is learned. Were imperfection not to be of the human, then no mistakes would ever be made. From this, no education would be wrought from the mistake not meant to be repeated. Though, a factory would repeat perceived-as-perfect designs, because what is beautiful, or truthful, or imperfect is inevitably human, while what is perfect is either dehumanizing or represents death. Then, to the order for what can be maintained and preserved, makes what is not repeated kept the same. To that sameness in knowledge for how wisdom is granted, for it to be passed along in words that represent the objectivism within the notion of human error.

This maintenance and preservation of wisdom is of its sameness to what has already been learned. Wisdom is not subjective, when its simplicity such as to not put flesh near the flame is to know one might be only ignorant for the experience of this. If personal experience is what proves, then let it be so for the person who disbelieves in another’s warnings or wisdom.

For order to be comprehended through a singular relation, it would then have a similarity to Justice. To this reference, Justice can be defined in the same manner as order would be, through the wisdom that blossoms from the one who has learned to be responsible or has just simply been educated. Then, one cannot connect subjectivity to wisdom, nor to the responsibility that would stem towards consequence from one’s mistakes through their freedom. To be subjective about order, or being responsible, or of wisdom, is to remain ignorant by never learning from choices. As choice relates itself to freedom, then so is the subjective self all about the decision. Though, to the limitations for freedom, is then to the same limits that relate to human imperfection, pertaining then to all flaws that comes from choice to consequence.

If it is order that compares itself with Justice, then it is the latter that never holds a comparison to subjectivist thinking. It is since no mistake, by this logic, could be subjective without questioning the imperfect person of their committed action. Since no action, as a mistake, is ever one without it being already subjected on its own, then further question to it would extend the division that resonates with a lack of order.

While Vengeance is the place of disorder, then through Justice comes order. Upon order, that through a person’s comprehended mistake they have caused, out of freedom to choose, brings about the consequences that responsibility would be required to mend. Imperfect humans learn, and improve, through their mistakes. It is freedom that encompasses choices, while no person is ever responsible with their decisions. Instead, a person is responsible for the consequences to their decision because no perfect choice has ever existed. To justify the mistake, perhaps to excuse the flaws behind it, is to be against order and Justice by how reason certifies itself.

Reason is the essence of excuse. To form reason, is to wriggle oneself out of being responsible. Reason is proven here as the core of escapism, same as a criminal during a period of interrogation might attempt to lie or cheat themselves out of being accountable for their actions.

It is never for the sake of Justice, bound up together with the coldness of logic, that compassion should be given to a criminal. Such is the risk, with those who would most certainly take advantage of offered compassion for their selfish benefit. Offering compassion to one who has not learned yet to be responsible, is the same as gifting freedom. Gifting freedom, or to offer compassion to a criminal is no different from breaking an incarcerated individual out of prison.

Once responsibility is learned for the future benefit of the once-ignorant person, order is maintained so long as this individual does not betray anyone’s current trust to their continued betterment.

Since it is by human error and incapability that a person will admit to being flawed and imperfect, then to all comprehension for the self is by way of knowing order cannot be subjective. To believe in such is to divide among the literal meaning of order, with such a definition that never pertains to division, though to togetherness.

Philosophy – “A Critique against the ‘Black Lives Matter’ Movement” – 5/10/2021

“Justice is, what denial isn’t. We cannot, as we might, find ourselves to find fault in another, without rejecting our own humanity. Our nature, to be imperfect, to be flawed, is to comprehend that the sides to a coin do not represent a sheer division; rather, they represent what exists to inevitably work towards the other’s needs or conveniences.”

– Modern Romanticism

It is all too alike, as we’re bound to find, that a fragile thing like Justice is often corrupted by the facilities of egotism and ambition. Upon this, what with the specific movement to discuss, that their catering towards the victimization of blacks, has resulted in extensive manipulation of purport. A purpose, by which one finds meaning in it, would ever be manipulated by a highness to one’s attitude, that perhaps had always been.

Among politics, egotism is the place of the survivor. For the one willing to outwit or outsmart the other, a task to manipulate has incredible hold upon those who are swayed to be under their arms. Within their grasp, and then, the manipulation is perceived to be a sight of goodness. How can one comprehend the truth of the politician, when one does not know them? Yet, they’ll admit to somehow knowing the victim, their place for what is needed, comprehend what limits are stirred for the sake of their unlimited power.

No one is ever “empowered”, within this movement, or those alike. The more dependence, the less gain, not the more. This should be common knowledge, though the person most willing to depend is also most unknowingly being deceived and manipulated. Lies are the weapon of politics. To be swayed under a politician’s control, is no longer through force.

No longer do we live in the days of direct and honest tyrants, who would use force to confiscate someone’s property. We now dwell within days when we are told to be living in “different times”, despite such words are, themselves, a deception.

People have not changed. Nothing has, for “change” would represent itself as mere chaos. Change is a synonym for chaos, to be nothing credited as more. To be within the belief that our species has changed, is ever through the essence of deception. That, to conceal ourselves, means that truth is no longer the boldness. We can be deceived, so much with ease, when we wish ourselves to enforce change, though nothing is ever altered.

As it is through chaos that a movement, as this, would be inspired to take up the mantle for the sake of Justice, then it cannot be. Justice cannot be for such a movement, if it speaks of change. We do not change, unless we yearn to dismantle what is, already. Though, to improve, for such is change’s opposite, would mean to never embrace chaos, though the order for which Justice stands.

By fire, such a movement has control, though none. Through flame, such a movement seeks Vengeance, not Justice. Change is uncontrolled, though it is improvement that is. Fire, spread like the wind, same as one’s voice for carrying out an advocation to another change; this is chaos. A chaotic spread, being of an uncontrolled blaze, is where Vengeance finds its home. And, to deceive those into believing one fights for Justice, using flame, is nothing short of a comedic skit.

Same with rage, flame is uncontrolled, if spread over the entirety. Only water, being superior to fire, can douse it.

Though, would such a movement find water, the expression of the vulnerable human nature, as the greater weapon to flame? They’d not, for then they’d no longer be manipulated.

Flames can be manipulated, under the command of who causes them, from those so responsible for decieving the world. Flames dance, as such people for this certain movement can be no more than puppets, made to waltz from corner to corner, hot within the ballroom.

A vulnerable side, a human side, would implore a person to find solutions. True solutions, brought from this vulnerable and human nature of people, not belonging to the inferiority behind fire. Water is superior to fire, thus making a solution formed through being vulnerable as the objectively better option.

Though, why would we find ourselves attracted to the flame? To be warm, of course, for it is an addiction. No longer would we become brave against the coldness of who we are, when we break ourselves down, instead of others. Those dependent on flame, or just dependent, will not go far from it.

Were we to find ourselves as vulnerable, we’d discover that anyone can feel our pain. For this is what flame, or anger, conceals. It conceals hurt.

How is it not plausible to attribute flame to deception, if rage conceals hurt?

If hurt is truth, and truth is hurtful, then flame would be the deception that hides it.

“Inside, there is Everything” – From “The Prejudice of Globalism” – 10/31/2020

There is everything of the inside of a person, beyond the color of skin, beyond the stains. To the essence of truth, coming from within, it is never a shallowness. Then, to the politician who cannot see that, will say against a teller of truth to merely hear their words. Though, not merely to the words that they’ll scorn, though to place blinded eyes upon their actions. For no person who merely speaks, will be one who ever acts. And, no person who is scorned for their language, can ever be someone who does not act.

Truth is always something that pierces, for it is always something that shocks. Just as the bullet penetrates skin, causing a shock, or just as a simple poke of a finger against a person’s flesh, is the same resulting feeling. “Shock” is the reaction of surprise, astonishment, amazement, all resonating from the irony of what is normally expected. This is to say that for the population who yearn for a well-spoken politician as their leader, are those who will take offense to the truth.

To all truth, resonating from within, makes the politician of mere words, as the one who objectively deceives. Words are the shallow aspect of all things that linger upon the surface. It is then that we can prove that all things upon the inside can be comprehended as truth. As truth, for what is tended to upon the inside, will never be received with prejudice. It is in the knowledge of what is within, that makes a betterment towards leadership. It is in the “everything” aspect of what can be better understood, that makes such a politician with this vision, unable to be prejudiced, nor deceitful. It makes the leader with the populist perspective, a person unable to be neither the racist, the sexist, the prejudiced one, nor the deceptive one.

For of each thing pertaining to the outside, makes such notions all of ignorance’s definition. Among what pertains to the outside, is a mere focus upon the external. Of all things external, is what pertains to what receives prejudice.

What receives prejudice, is upon the outside. We are never prejudiced towards what is within, for how can we be? How can a person be prejudiced towards the favorability of what one easily comprehends? One, upon the external, merely forces meaning into it. It is something already so simple to understand, for the politician to make a drawing. A painting or image to the skin color, is the same to the solid color of a wall. The solid color to a wall had been covered. Its nakedness, already clothed. It makes the deception for what one does not yearn to see, beyond. As such, “nakedness” is the result of what is “revealing”, being always in reference to truth. One, in the case of a person covering themselves, is not trusted to see truth. As such, the shock of what could be seen, is becoming the suffocation unto the death of that truth. One covers, and now the curious are distrusted, for it is now the intent to never reveal the truth. It is now the intent to be dishonest. Just as the nude form causes shock, it is the same for all truth. If one adds to the example of graffiti, with tattoos, is the act of merely applying another layer to cover what can be revealing.

Vandalizing truth is the same as sparking prejudice. To the person who claims there are those who wrongly ridicule graffiti, should perhaps wonder why anyone would question the outside of anything. To the one of objective intellect, will question, not merely listen to, what remains upon the surface. To the canvas for the painting, as it was not ever first a surface, though a sheer blankness. Graffiti is merely a covering over a surface, already drawn. Therefore, it is objectively a covering upon truth, creating deception. It makes the painting the creation of truth.

To the focus upon surfaces, is never the focus upon the internal, for it has been covered. We can apply innumerable layers, though truth remains forever waiting to be unearthed.

As we are always prejudiced to what is external, we are not ever the same to what is internal. This makes the globalist perspective as the mindset of prejudice. Such means, that for the globalist perspective, there is purely external endeavors being enacted. Then, to what is within, there is purely the avoidance of could be seen, and could be solved of grievance. This marks the politician of a globalist perspective as one who is prejudiced. For in what a person can know best, makes them not prejudiced. It makes a person who attempts to comprehend what is outside, someone who will be ignorant. It is unknown territory where one dwells, marking a strict focus upon the outside, related to looking upon one’s skin color.

The outside, which holds the same definition as anything to be prejudiced towards, is opposite from the inside. To say it, again, the internal is what cannot be received with prejudice. And, to say it, again, the one with a globalist perspective, believes not in aiding what can be known best, being within. It is to say that when a supposed leader holds such a perspective of globalism, makes what is within, secondary to their focus.

How is anyone to say that the leader who holds a populist mindset, can be prejudiced towards anything? It is objectively not the case, when to have a populist mindset, is to focus on what is within, being opposite from the prejudiced and globalist view upon the external.

Quote – “The Constriction of a Utopia” – 7/29/2020

“All man-made peace is as lasting as the union first gathered. Its duration ends upon the constriction of that collection, down to the smaller units, until it becomes the individual whose mind has questioned what is. For it is that the utopia can only ever be true, when individualized. A person whose mind is not at ease will make the rest not at ease. When such occurs, the individual is either killed or exiled from the group.

Any person’s peace is their peace, not the world’s own. The world does not know peace, when it knows war. The individual becomes a dictator, when their peace becomes the world’s war.”

– Modern Romanticism

Quote – “In Love, a Person Communicates, Understands, and Forgives” – 7/28/2020

“A human is so much a human, when they will be willing to punish. How else is God described, besides the one who forgives the sinner?

A human, a punisher, and it is only because they have a form to feel pleasure through, that they will do this. A human craves. And, in what they crave, they punish another to deal pain, learning another’s weakness.

Though, through love, a person can communicate to understand, and in that understanding, a person learns to forgive. Learn the tale, before the judgement to punish, and one can judge a person’s truest fault, being their humanity. In this, they will comprehend themselves the same as another.

They will break themselves like not waves against the shore, though against each other. They now know each other’s storm, and they can connect in the calm.”

– Modern Romanticism

Quote – “Why Love Originates War” – 7/27/2020

“If any human was allowed to wander into privacy without restriction, we’d not be conquerors. Such is never the case when a human will protect what should not be touched by alien hands. For it is not the offense, though the defense, that ignites the war.”

– Modern Romanticism

Quote – “Why World Peace is in Vain” – 7/6/2020

“We kiss our beloved to greet them. We kiss them upon a farewell. One last kiss, or one last dance, and it is all very personal. The world cannot be looked at, as though of one story. We may have the same ink for the page, though to erase the necessary division that allows us to possess a unique side, a proud side, for what we’ve done, makes us little. Pain is to where we find belonging.

We require pain, because pain teaches us the greatest lessons. We require it, because pain is the avenue to strength. What will world peace be, if pain is non-existent? We’d not ever see the road to strength. We’d be stuck. We’d be stagnant. We’d be lost.”

– Anonymous

Philosophy – “The Necessity of Human Judgement” – 5/15/2020

Love is a judgement, pointed at imperfection.

It is because if God is a being believed to be perfect in His essence, then it is love that is the emotion for humans to feel, to draw a flawed person into perfection. We say over again to others to “never judge” another on their imperfections. Yet, what is the difference between seeing a problem and seeing simple humanity?

Humans are imperfect by their humanity. Though, when a human being loves another human being, we are loving them because love is the perfect emotion. Love is the only emotion, and perhaps the only thing in this world, to be called “perfect”. Therefore, such an emotion has no “existence”.

For an Atheist to say that God does not exist, would merely be pointing out the obvious. Everything imperfect is something a human can relate to, while everything perfect is something a human cannot relate to. We cannot relate directly relate to God, without spouting arrogance. We can, however, love. Through love, we are closest to God, to being perfect, as we can ever be.

“Existence” is only ever defined as “relation”. The familiar, being why an Atheist believes more in reality. Love has no existence, because again, we cannot directly relate to divinity.

Therefore, for a human to “judge” merely means to act as God, pulling someone with pain away from that suffering, to somewhere more peaceful. Like Heaven, that is the bliss of forgetting life, and embracing love.

To cite an example of this:

Imagine one loving human who has a friend whom they care about. That friend has a smoking habit, and has had it for years. They’ve both been friends for years, and the non-smoker friend has been procrastinating on helping their smoker friend. That smoking habit is, of course, a flaw. It has become a craving based on simple human imperfection. Through that non-smoker friend’s care for their smoker friend, they have made a judgement, might one day act on that judgement, because negligence is opposite from responsibility. Responsibility is something that is connected to love.

If we love, then we care. We care enough to make a judgement, and to pull a person with an evident problem away from it. It is only through that care from such a feeling of love, that with the perfection in love we can do something about imperfection.

If a scientist believes more-so in reality versus love, then they will only create further imperfections. Though, science is useful for the material and practical issues of the world. They are not so good for the impractical and metaphysical issues of the world, that are those to be the origin of what science handles.

It is true, through that last sentence of the last paragraph, that the feeling of love is what originates war. Yet, we confuse war to be something based on destruction. We only lose our lives because we were selfless, were we not? Is selflessness not defined as embracing poverty? In the protection, not the destruction, of others, we destroy those who deem to harm.

Philosophy – “There are Winners or Losers in War” – 5/5/2020

“The temporary life is the temporary peace. The eternal life is the eternal war.”

– Anonymous

War is a challenge for anyone willing to be brave enough to face life’s trials. There are those who say that war is not winnable, nor are there any losers. However, could one comprehend it from a cancer patient’s perspective? Their “war” is theirs to win, and should they win it, their peace and strength will be magnified before they had the war with cancer.

Take it from a person with depression. Such a war with depression is not permanent, should they choose to face it. Whatever was causing their depression, should that be from a traumatic loss or whatever else, is meant to be countered until the war is won. Then, peace is discovered.

If war is the opposite of peace, then the word “battle” means nothing. One could say that life is a battle, or that life is a struggle, or that life is a never-ending war. Life wars with life, life wars with itself, as this means that the winnable war makes the temporary peace, making the temporary life. The soldier that died on the battlefield, is now the dead hero. They were the ones who lost their lives, or simply lost. If war is a game to politicians, like pieces on the chess board, then so is life, full of winners and losers. We are temporary, both in our eyes, and in the eyes of those who provide for us, as a world leader.

The temporary peace, or the temporary life, is opposite from the eternal war, called life. Though, we are not meant to count ourselves among others, not meant to compete through pain, in the example of a person with cancer or the person with depression. We do not, because we are attempting to survive, like any war. If war can be won, then peace can be found. If one were to swap the idea of life, with the idea of death, and make life the eternal peace, one creates a greater weakness in their life than ever war could.

A war that is won, is proven to not have been permanent, such as the case of a person with depression. When they win their war, it was not life they conquered, because such is impossible. It was merely territory that they conquered, got to know, so that whatever battles that are similar is now within their territory.

Winning a war merely means to achieve peace. Though, peace is more temporary than war, and such cannot be helped. We thrive on conflict to become stronger, as a species. If one should disagree, then what of the bodybuilder? The bodybuilder, in a sense, breaks down their muscle fibers during their training, so that when they rest (in peace), they strengthen. In the same sense, people will cause deliberate conflict, inject deceit into a society to stir chaos, so that society is maintained with a cycle. A cycle of conflict to peace, and peace to conflict. Then, the world strengthens. Like the routine of a bodybuilder, it is disciplined and systematic. It is strategic, like war. Tactical, like war. Thoughtful, like war. But, never heartfelt. It is because what is on the leader’s mind, is what their heart mainly tells it. Their strategies, their tactics, comes from a desire to defend.

The heart is only associated with the protection of others, during war. To fight another’s battle, is no different than a politician placing pawns on the chess board, used for warfare. In the sense that a mind will follow a heart, is in the sense that a general will be the one using tactics, a leader or anyone else the same, when anyone else is used for those tactics.

The won war will be the returned war, when history repeats itself. That is the essence of human stupidity. To believe in the notion of advancement, like armies, and believing that one can correct a past mistake, by simply replicating it through a different approach. Sad things is, armies do not know anything else besides slaughter and who to leave behind, while they walk forward. The heart leads the army forward, and those they’ve slain, are leaked of their heart’s contents on the soil.

Will war return? It will, though of the same appearance? No.

A Quote of Wisdom – “What is Normal?” – 3/10/2020

“What is normal in our world? Or, perhaps the question should be, ‘What is abnormal?’ Leading a troubled person away from a degrading direction, away from an addiction, or something similar, is simply the process of humanity in its finest showing. Would one, upon noticing that their friend, through their grief, became an addict on something, merely leave that person to their supposed ‘normal’ direction? One could easily state that the direction they believed was a right one, and now is a normal one, should be left alone.

How many moronic ‘studies’ are going to focus on the normalcy of human perspective? Why not make the focus on the empathetic vision towards what is not normal, in what one views?

That is, to lead someone in a direction that is not painful, that is not harmful? Because, does anyone really know what they are doing in a time when they are truly vulnerable, truly hurt?”

A Quote – “Love is a Great Human Interest” – Romance – 2/6/2020

“Love is the stillness of captivation. Before the eyes of familiarity, we are enthralled. We open to them, with arms that only ever close, when they are shut around the beloved. But, what makes love eternal? It must be when their presence is non-existent. We remember the beloved, even when they should only be in the next room. We remember them, beyond death, to the next day.”

Poem – “One Loving Face” – Romance – 12/28/2019

One loving face
Restores a vow.

Gifted, as it were
To what Heaven allowed.
In our place, among sands
As white as snow,

As bright as the sun
In its golden resplendence.

A child exists in you.
It is me,
The one who finds nighttime to be so Hellish,
While the Heaven in your eyes
I find to kiss the nightmares to die.

My grief was two crystalline currents,
There, roaring across my feeble face,
When the previous one
Went without me,
In my place among loneliness.

As your lips part,
I see a kiss, foretold, for the future.

But, you speak of my sins,
And speak of forgiveness!

A line has criminals
Waiting for Hell’s gates to open,
So they can be free.

And will I be free, in your open arms?